hubris-or-poor-judgment?-as-epstein-files-loomed,-the-clock-was-ticking-on-brad-karp’s-power-at-paul,-weiss

Hubris Or Poor Judgment? As Epstein Files Loomed, The Clock Was Ticking On Brad Karp’s Power At Paul, Weiss

Ed. note: Welcome to our daily feature, Quote of the Day.

[W]hy didn’t Karp quit sooner?

How could he not have anticipated that his ties to Epstein would, sooner or later, see the light of day? The timing of the release of the Justice Department’s Epstein files was always uncertain. Months, years. No one was sure. But there was a wide feeling that they would at some point emerge, a fact made clearer once the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed a Congressional vote in November. …

For such a long-tenured, shrewd leader—one noted for his skill in navigating crises and managing the media—the failure to anticipate publicity around his involvement with Epstein, and its likely impact, is jarring. At best, it is what one insider called “poor judgment,” and at worst, it was a hubristic act to hold onto power despite the huge reputational, even moral, implications.

— Krishnan Nair, Managing Editor of Law.com’s international arm, in commentary concerning Brad Karp’s desicison to step down from his leadership role at Paul, Weiss once his ties to Jeffrey Epstein were revealed in the latest tranche of documents released from the Epstein files.


Staci Zaretsky is the managing editor of Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on BlueskyX/Twitter, and Threads, or connect with her on LinkedIn.

The post Hubris Or Poor Judgment? As Epstein Files Loomed, The Clock Was Ticking On Brad Karp’s Power At Paul, Weiss appeared first on Above the Law.