
Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, a member of the hip-hop group Fugees, has said he is entitled to a new trial partly because his former lawyer used an experimental artificial intelligence program to draft an inadequate closing argument.
A new-trial motion filed by Michel’s new lawyers said the closing included “frivolous arguments,” misunderstood the required elements of the crimes, and “failed to highlight key weaknesses in the government’s case.”
…
“At bottom,” the new-trial motion said, “the AI program failed [Michel’s defense counsel, David] Kenner, and Kenner failed Michel.”
You can’t just go strumming people’s closing arguments with your AI. If Kenner were as avid an Above the Law reader as you, he would have seen our coverage of that time AI was faulty and made up caselaw or that other time it was faulty and made up caselaw. Once is an an accident, twice is notice — part of representing your clients is making sure that you’re the one doing the representing and not relying wholly on some snazzy tech. This time the culprit isn’t ChatGPT:
A press release issued after Michel’s trial said the AI program EyeLevel.AI was used in Michel’s trial, the first use of such a program in a federal trial.
The press release said EyeLevel.AI was launched with CaseFile Connect. Kenner said in the press release the AI program “turned hours or days of legal work into seconds.”
Wishing the best of luck to Pras and the ones who lost because a lawyer got lazy. That embedded song title was a bit of a stretch, but you get what I’m going for.
Hip-hop Star Seeks New Trial Over Lawyer’s Alleged Use Of Artificial Intelligence To Draft Closing Argument [ABA Journal]

